Start with the evidence, not an assumption.
A site’s present-day appearance does not explain its full history. Bombing, military land use and subsequent redevelopment can all influence the assessment. The important question is how the available evidence relates to the footprint and depth of your proposed works.
We scope preliminary or detailed research around the project boundary, existing information and the decisions your team needs to make. An assessment should explain the evidence, its limitations and the reasoning behind any recommendation. A higher level of research does not automatically mean a physical survey is required.
What the scope can include
- Defined site boundary and description of proposed works
- Review of relevant bombing and military land-use evidence
- Clear discussion of evidence gaps and assessment limitations
- Recommendations for further research or proportionate mitigation
What we need from you
- Site address and red-line boundary
- Work types, depths and foundation proposals
- Previous assessments and ground investigation reports
- Programme and reporting requirements
Is a risk assessment the same as a UXO survey?
No. An assessment interprets evidence and evaluates risk. A physical survey collects information on the ground. The assessment helps determine whether a survey or another mitigation measure is justified.